---
title: Methodology
description: "How multi-armed bandits work in Statsig Autotune to automatically allocate traffic to the best- performing variant based on a single goal metric."
product: general
last_updated: 2025-09-18
token_estimate: 667
---
# Methodology

> For AI agents: a documentation index is available at [/llms.txt](/llms.txt). Append `.md` to any page URL for markdown, or send `Accept: text/markdown`.

## Model

The base Autotune implementation uses a Thompson Sampling (Bayesian) algorithm to estimate each variant's probability of being the best variant and allocate a proportional amount of traffic.

For example, if a given variant has a 60% probability of being the best, Autotune allocates 60% of the traffic to it. The multi-armed bandit algorithm adds more users to a treatment as soon as it determines that treatment is clearly better at maximizing the reward (the target metric).

Throughout the process, higher-performing treatments receive more traffic and underperforming treatments receive less. When the winning treatment beats the second-best treatment by a specified margin, the process ends.

Some helpful references:

- [Statsig Blog](https://www.statsig.com/blog/introducing-autotune)
- [Goyal and Agrawal (Microsoft Research)](https://proceedings.mlr.press/v23/agrawal12/agrawal12.pdf) Regret Analysis
- [Doordash Engineering](https://doordash.engineering/2022/03/15/using-a-multi-armed-bandit-with-thompson-sampling-to-identify-responsive-dashers/) Summary Blog

## Advantages

The main advantage of the base Multi-Armed Bandit over a contextual bandit is its ability to converge and identify the best variant. When a single solution works well for all users, the Multi-Armed Bandit efficiently allocates traffic and determines the correct long-term solution while minimizing regret. Regret is the cost of exposing many users to a worse variant, as happens in an A/B test.

## Disadvantages

The main disadvantage of a Multi-Armed Bandit compared to a contextual bandit is its inability to personalize. When user attributes interact with variants, Autotune can identify a global maximum that is worse than serving each user their individual best variant.

For example, even if the "US Flag" variant had the highest overall CTR, it would be a poor choice for Canadian users. In such cases, both groups converge to a sub-optimal variant.

|  | A/B/n Test | Multi-Armed Bandit (Autotune) | Contextual Bandit (Autotune AI) | Ranking Engine |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Typical # Variants | 2-3 | 4-8 | 4-8 | Arbitrary # |
| Personalization Factor | None | None | Moderate | High |
| Input Data Required | None | Very Little (100+ samples) | Little - generally 1000+ samples | Tens of thousands to millions of samples |
| Model Efficacy | None | Basic | Moderate | High |
| Identifies Best Variant | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Consistent User Assignment | Yes | No | No | No |

